Shortly after his election as Pope, I wrote an article on how the Pope would be judged on people's personal preferences of what the Pope should be.
About six months later, I believe my point has been proven. We have a Pope who is unconventional according to the behavior of Bl. John Paul II and Benedict XVI. However, when Pope Francis speaks, I see a Pope who is challenging us Catholics not to be complacent instead of condemning our opponents.
Unfortunately, certain conservative Catholics -- and not just "rad trads" -- are taking offense with his unconventional style.
To this, I find myself thinking this:
It's one thing to desire the Pope to speak on certain subjects. That's natural. But to consider him a disappointment (or worse) because he doesn't match our preferences? That's being judgmental and making ourselves the arbiter of what is authenticly Catholic.
Think about it. If we act churlishly when the Church challenges us, how can we serve as a witness to the Church when she challenges the world?
No comments:
Post a Comment